Another major source I will
be using for the paper will be the 1937 Supreme Court case of West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish. The court
case dealt with a woman challenging her employer over not receiving minimum
wage under Washington state law. The Supreme Court case decided that the
Washington state law was constitutional, setting a precedent for the legality
of minimum wage laws. The court case is important to paper because around the time
the decision was given FDR was trying to appoint more justices to the Supreme
Court, since they had previously ruled against Roosevelt’s New Deal
legislation. The decision in the case represented a dramatic reversal in the
Court’s decision making in regards to New Deal laws. The swing vote in the case
was Justice Owen J. Roberts, who had previously decided against New Deal
legislation in previous cases. Some historians have claimed that the decision
in Parrish was made in order to
prevent Roosevelt from “packing” the court and threating the integrity of the
Supreme Court. Regardless of the reasons behind the decision the case
represented a major paradigm shift in the way the Supreme Court handled New
Deal legislation from that point on.
Associate Justice Owen Roberts |
OK - so you are using previous court cases in order to establish WHY Roosevelt did what he did.
ReplyDelete